International Pilot Project for Technology Co-operation
Final Report
A multi-national technical
evaluation of performance of commercial
off the shelf metal detectors in the context of humanitarian demining
Editors:
Y. Das (CA), J.T. Dean (EC), D. Lewis (UK), J.H.J. Roosenboom (NL), G. Zahaczewsky (US)
EUR 19719 EN - 2001
Participants:
Canada - Defence Research Establishment, Suffield;
European Commission - EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra;
The Netherlands - Royal Netherlands Army, The Hague; TNO FEL, The Hague;
United Kingdom - Defence Evaluation and Research Agency, Chertsey;
United States of America - U.S. Department of Defense, Washington DC.
Abstract
The results of an evaluation of the detection
performance for 29 commercial off the shelf (COTS) metal detectors, against a range of
low-metal-content anti-personnel mines and some simulant targets, are described in this
report. This work was undertaken by organizations from four nations together with the
European Commission, in the International Pilot Project for Technology Co-operation
(IPPTC) in the Humanitarian Demining R&D environment.
This report gives a summary of the methodologies and results. Detectors
were assessed for performance in air; in a range of soils; and in realistic demining
scenarios in Cambodia and Croatia. In addition, the human factors aspect relating to the
use of each detector was assessed.
The in-air tests included measurement of sensitivity, drift with time,
effect of moisture on the detector head, the assessment of the possibility to set-up the
detector consistently and measurement of the sensitivity volume relative to the sensor
head. In-soil tests provide comparison of performance in four different soil types under
carefullycontrolled conditions. The measurements in Cambodia and Croatia allow comparison
of performance measured under laboratory conditions with that achieved by deminers in
field conditions.
A two-page summary of performance is provided for each detector.
A strong correlation was observed between the values for the magnetic
susceptibility of the soil and the performance achieved by operational metal detectors.
This suggests that such measurements should be a part of Level Two Surveys of suspected
mined areas.
References are given to the reports of the full assessments made by the participants and
to relevant test protocol documents. |