Helmet and Visor Blast Performance

Objective
Evaluate the capability of a wide range of different visor and helmet
systems to protect a deminer from the effects of a blast AP landmine.
Description
In this study, three types of lightweight protective helmets were evaluated:
the Sport Helmet developed by Med-Eng with visors of
nominal thickness values of 4.5 mm (0.173 in.), 5.0 mm (0.196 in.), and
5.7 mm (0.224 in.); a construction hardhat mounted with a full face visor
of 4.3 mm (0.17 in.) thickness designed and constructed by Hameed and
Ali Research Center; and a 4.8 mm (0.19 in.) nominal thickness full face
visor mounted on a headband, manufactured by Lightweight Body Armor, Ltd.
The hardhat and headband systems were used in conjunction with the Med-Eng
Humanitarian Demining Ensemble (HDE), but with the chest
plate removed in order to simulate a standard flak vest or ballistic apron.
The full HDE with the chest plate installed was used during most
of the tests with the Sport Helmet. Simulated mines, consisting
of C4 plastic explosives, were buried with 1 cm of overburden. Three sizes
of simulated mines were used containing 50, 100 and 200 grams of C4, chosen
to represent a wide range of blast type AP landmines.
|
Performance
In all tests, regardless of charge
size, the visor was blown off both the hardhat and headband systems. When
the Sport Helmet was used with the integrated chest plate, the
visor was removed in just over 25% of the tests (out of 19 tests); and
in 60% of the trials (out of 14 tests) without the interfacing chestplate.
One benefit of having a visor remain in place over the face throughout
the mine detonation sequence was demonstrated by observing the intense
short-lived fireball which could easily engulf a deminer's upper body
including the face. The presence of a visor ensures that burn injuries
are kept to a minimum. Also, the overpressure at the ear was shown to
be positively affected by a head protection system - the Sport Helmet
consistently permitted lower peak overpressure levels from reaching the
ear as compared to the hardhat and headband systems. Tests with a range
of visor thicknesses demonstrated that even a small increase in thickness
has a significant effect on the ability of the visor to prevent high velocity
fragmentation from reaching the face of a deminer. For example, the test
results demonstrated that by increasing visor thickness from 5.0 to 5.7
mm, one could decrease the chance of a fragment penetration of the visor
by a factor of 8.
Status
The results of the study are available on the DoD
Humanitarian Demining website at humanitariandemining.org.
|

Med-Eng Systems Sport
Helmet with a full face visor.
|